The EYFS paperwork you can safely stop doing
Most childminders are doing considerably more written work than anyone has ever asked them for. Not because the framework requires it — because a training course, a template pack or a Facebook group said it did.
In short
- Ofsted will not ask to see your tracking or assessment records. That is their published position, not our opinion.
- There is no required format for observations, learning journeys or planning. None. However you do it is fine.
- The progress check at age two is genuinely required — and it is a short written summary, not a portfolio.
- The records that actually matter are the boring ones: safeguarding, attendance, accidents, medication, complaints.
- If a piece of paperwork does not help a child or satisfy a specific requirement, it is costing you evenings for nothing.
Check this against the framework yourself.
This is a plain-English summary to help you decide what to keep. It is not legal advice. The statutory framework is on GOV.UK — use the version for childminders. If your local authority or childminder agency requires something extra as a condition of funding or membership, that is a separate obligation and this page does not override it.
What Ofsted actually says
This is the part most childminders have never read, because it is buried in guidance nobody sends you. Ofsted’s own published guidance for childminders says:
“It is up to you how you assess children’s progress, and inspectors will not ask to see any internal tracking or assessment information.” Ofsted — guidance for childminders on inspection and the EYFS
And on the shape of it:
“You should use whatever approach to paperwork suits you and are free to file it however you like.” Ofsted — same guidance
And on how much:
“Assessments should not require excessive paperwork. You should draw on your knowledge of the child and your own expert professional judgement.” Ofsted — same guidance
Read those three together and the position is unambiguous. Nobody is coming to count your observations. The inspector wants to see that you know the children — and they will work that out by watching you with them and talking to you, not by reading a folder.
Why this is worth internalising
Childminders lose evenings, and sometimes leave the profession, over paperwork nobody required. If you take one thing from this page: the folder is not the evidence. You are the evidence. The folder is a tool, and only worth keeping where it actually helps you do the job.
What you genuinely must record
The framework does specify records. They are almost entirely about safety and administration, not learning.
- Attendance — a daily record of the children you care for, with hours of attendance.
- Accidents and injuries, and any first aid given.
- Medication administered, with written parental permission.
- Emergency contact and consent details for each child, kept current.
- Complaints, and how you dealt with them.
- Safeguarding — a policy, and records of any concerns or referrals.
- Details of who lives or works on the premises, and the checks you hold for them.
- Risk assessment — you must assess risk, though there is no requirement for a written assessment of every activity.
- Public liability insurance, and evidence of it.
- The progress check at age two — see below.
That is broadly the list. It is short, dull, and mostly things you would keep anyway.
What is entirely up to you
None of the following is required in any particular form. Some are useful. All are optional, and how you do them is your call.
Keep it if it helps you, drop it if it doesn’t
- Written observations. No required number, format or frequency.
- Learning journeys and scrapbooks. Lovely for parents. Not a requirement.
- Photographs of every activity. No.
- Next steps written for every child every week. No.
- Tracking grids and progress percentages. Explicitly not asked for at inspection.
- Written weekly plans. Planning is expected; a written plan in a set format is not.
- Individual written risk assessments for every outing. Assess the risk — yes. Write one per trip to the park — no.
- Cohort tracking. You have three children. This is a school concept.
Some of these are genuinely worth keeping in a lighter form. Parents love a photo and a sentence. That is a business decision about your service, though — not compliance.
The progress check at age two
This one is required, so it is worth getting right.
Between a child’s second and third birthday you must give parents a short written summary of their development in the three prime areas: communication and language, physical development, and personal, social and emotional development.
What it needs to do:
- Describe how the child is doing in those three areas.
- Identify strengths, and anything where progress is less than expected.
- Describe what you are doing about any concerns, including involving other professionals where needed.
- Be written in language parents can actually understand.
Length
A side of A4 is a perfectly respectable progress check. The framework asks for a short written summary. A twelve-page document with photographs is not better — it is just longer, and harder for a parent to read.
Where health and early education reviews happen around the same time, aligning your check with the health visitor’s two-year review is sensible and reduces duplication for the family.
Where the myths come from
If none of this is required, why does everyone think it is? Four reasons, and it helps to recognise them.
-
Template packs
Somebody sells a 60-page pack. It has to look worth the money, so it includes everything imaginable. Buyers reasonably assume the contents are requirements.
-
Training built for nurseries
Much early years training is written for group settings, where a manager genuinely does need tracking data across forty children. A childminder with three does not, and the training rarely says so.
-
Inspection folklore
“My inspector asked for X” travels fast and mutates. Inspectors ask for what is relevant to what they have just observed. One inspector asking one childminder for one thing is not a rule.
-
Fear
The honest one. Paperwork feels like insurance. If the folder is thick enough, surely nothing can go wrong. It does not work like that, and the folder is a poor substitute for knowing the child.
A test for any piece of paperwork
Before you fill in another form, ask these three questions in order. If you get to the end without a yes, stop doing it.
The three questions
- Is it on the required list? Safeguarding, attendance, accidents, medication, consents, complaints, the two-year check. If yes, keep it, and keep it properly.
- Does it change what I actually do with a child? If writing it makes you notice something and act differently, it is earning its place. If you write it and never look at it again, it is not.
- Does a parent genuinely value it? Then it is marketing, and worth doing deliberately and proportionately — not out of obligation.
Most abandoned paperwork fails all three, and everyone knows it at the time.
What to do with the time
This is not an argument for doing less. It is an argument for putting the effort where it counts.
- Be able to talk about each child. Where they are, what you have noticed, what you are doing next, what you have said to their parents. That conversation is what an inspection actually turns on.
- Act on what you notice, quickly. A concern raised with a parent this week is worth more than the same concern recorded beautifully and raised in March.
- Get the safeguarding records genuinely right. This is the one place where thorough is correct.
- Talk to parents more. Two minutes at the door beats a laminated sheet.
- Take your evenings back. Burnout is a bigger risk to the children in your care than an unwritten observation.
One caveat, honestly
If your local authority, childminder agency or a funding agreement requires specific records, that is a real obligation and this page does not override it. Ask what is required versus recommended — and ask in writing. The answer is often more relaxed than the training implied.
Where to go next
We’ll tell you when the rules change
Two statutory frameworks changed on 1 September 2026 — the EYFS and the Ofsted inspection framework. Most childminders found out from a Facebook post weeks later. Leave your email and we’ll tell you the next time something changes, in plain English, with what you actually need to do.
Only when something genuinely changes. Not a newsletter. Stop any time.